Skip to content

Conversation

m-ou-se
Copy link
Member

@m-ou-se m-ou-se commented Apr 12, 2022

See #95727 (comment) and the five comments below that.

Unblocks #95727.

@m-ou-se m-ou-se added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Apr 12, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Apr 12, 2022
@joshtriplett
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 12, 2022

📌 Commit 284255a has been approved by joshtriplett

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 12, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 12, 2022
Rollup of 4 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#95783 (rustdoc doctest: include signal number in exit status)
 - rust-lang#95794 (`parse_tt`: a few more tweaks)
 - rust-lang#95963 ([bootstrap] Grab the right FileCheck binary for dist when cross-compiling.)
 - rust-lang#95975 (Don't test -Cdefault-linker-libraries=yes when cross compiling.)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 550a510 into rust-lang:master Apr 12, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.62.0 milestone Apr 12, 2022
@m-ou-se m-ou-se deleted the test-70093-no-cross branch April 13, 2022 09:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants